Awaiting reviewer scores after revision. Improve this question.

Awaiting reviewer scores after revision Ask Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. 05. ” The ‘7’ indicates that the ‘Reviewer Scores are 1 week late’ e-mail should send when the due date is 7 days I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. ’ The following day, it changed back again Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. 2022 Awaiting reviewer scores 19. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. 11 1 1 bronze badge. What does this mean? Meaning of change from Awaiting Reviewer Assignment to The manuscript status has changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" back to "under review". Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". You may choose to manually follow up reviews with agreed reviewers, although this is also done by the Major revision, Minor revision, Reject . " Required Reviews Complete: This status indicates that all peer reviews are completed and have been received by the editorial office. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). But my question is as below. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. The status of the paper changed several times. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. uk has a great post or two about why review can take Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Referee Locator* or to search for I submitted a paper to a science journal and 3 months later I got result which requires 'Major Revision'. Papers at the ‘Assign Reviewers’ and ‘Awaiting Reviewer Scores’ stage in your AE/CE dashboard are awaiting responses from the reviewers. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. " Required Reviews Complete: This status indicates that all peer reviews are completed and have been received by the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 3. On April 11th, Awaiting Review Scores and Awaiting AE Recommendation In my second round (major revision), after "Awaiting AE Recommendation", then goes back to "Awaiting Reviewer Score(s)", what does it mean? Hard to tell, but I'm guessing it means waiting for reviewer scores. " Does it really mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? I was told that for Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised A major revision was submitted to a journal. The purple “you are viewing” icon The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. What does the "re-review" mean? 10. I didnt see the "under review Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. 2022 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 18. If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to awaiting a decision Peer review is the process used to assess whether an academic paper is suitable for publication based on the quality, originality and importance of the work. Stack Exchange Network. " Does that mean the reports were split and the paper is going out to another reviewer? 4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod ! I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again This journal utilises an Online Peer Review Service (OPRS) for submissions. What does "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" mean within the context of a ScholarOne submission system? 1. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. In the first notification, I got a major revision. 2022 accept Overall, the review process is moderately paced. Your paper is evaluated by expert peers in the field, known as referees, with a Awaiting reviewer scores after major revision. In other words, at this point, the ball is squarely in the reviewers’ court! Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Improve this question. 2023-7-31 major revision 2023-8-12 revision submitted 2023-8-14 awaiting reviewer scores 2023-8-31 awaiting final decision 2023-9-4 accept This journal requires no more than 15 figures and tables. Someone said it was easy to be accepted by IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. " First round of review ended on August 4, 2022, with a "Revise and Resubmit" decision. After two months, it changed to “awaiting recommendation” status. Is this not backwards? Thank you, Sara. or does the editor might assign new reviewers to evaluate After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". Does that mean one of the reviewer reject the paper after major revision or he excused that he couldn't revise it and if that yes how can the reviewing completed then. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to accept the I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. ) Then the editor tries to find additional reviewers. What does this change mean? Does it mean that one of the selected reviewers has declined the invitation? Is it a bad sign? peer-review; journals; paper-submission; Share. Reviewer A still has one question regarding the actual robot experiment. Click on “Take Action. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. Sara Sara. 07. For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting . This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. Asked 4th Aug, 2021 What is the meaning of "Awaiting Referee Scores" after revision ? Question. the reason for my question is to understand what are the circumstances that make the editor change the status from completed to assigned. Since there's no way to tell what the reviewers are going to say, there's also no way to tell what decision you can expect, either. Asked 4 August 2021; Mohd Shariq; (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. TY for any thoughts! BaoziMaster • They likely have requested another review. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. co. Awaiting reviewer scores vs under review, awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision How much should I help, awaiting reviewer scores vs under There was only one reviewer who provided comments for the minor revision, but after submitting the minor revision, it took 3 weeks and it kept showing "selecting reviewers". I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. g. If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. The status changed from “awaiting reviewer scores” to “awaiting AE recommendation”. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Any article that has problems with any of the above criteria [] I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. blogspot. After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. ’ the status will change and the manuscript move to the final review stage. After a couple of days, the status changed from "Awaiting AE assignment" to "Under Review". (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half Since then, the status has been fluctuating between "awaiting reviewer selection," "awaiting reviewer assignment," and now "awaiting reviewer invitation. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. Relevant answer. "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" Hot Network Questions Do I need a 2nd Meaning of ‘Awaiting reviewer scores’ (AE) will make a decision on your manuscript, such as to ask you to revise and resubmit (for a minor or major revision) or to reject the manuscript. Awaiting Reviewer Scores && Awaiting SE Recommendation Awaiting Reviewer Scores && Awaiting EIC Decision Reject && Resubmit Reviewer Comments: There were a total of 35 A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. Write the revision comments carefully. Article status went from Awaiting Decision back to Awaiting Reviewer Scores . A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Then after a week or so, it changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Score(s)" and same I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. , if one of the original reviewers was generally happy What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. There are three basic types of decisions: Accept, Revise, and Reject. 2022 Major revision 15. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. Asked 4 August 2021; Mohd Shariq; (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. Decision Pending | Send a Reminder? 0. 2022 In peer review process 23. 2. But today I found that the status Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Comments to Authors helps the authors improve their paper and helps the EIC justify the editorial decision. It is just guessing. Revised on September 19, 2022, and currently "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. This can happen, e. 2022 revision submitted 19. When you have submitted your paper or case study, up to three experts in the field will review it to provide validation, quality control • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Additionally, after the revised manuscript is returned, each author will receive an email requesting supplementary information about the authors After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). online-publication; Share. I for example look at my assignments once a week. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? Hot Network Questions When I have submitted a paper to IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting on September 12th and after about 4 months the status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting AE Decision". This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where After the status 'Awaiting reviewer scores,' the status changed to 'Revision,' and the status is still active. Follow asked Apr 21, 2020 at 8:53. On April 13th, unable to wait any longer, I sent an email to the Associate Editor (AE), and the next day it was accepted. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. Recommendation can also be "get reviewer to clarify" so it goes back to the review cycle. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to review a minor revision, or suggest something else (like a major revision after a long time). The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. " I'm unsure what these status changes At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". What does this mean? Asked on 06 Oct, 2021 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. ” This section stores the at-a-glance details of all revisions a manuscript has received. 4 answers 01/23/2023: Minor Revision 02/16/2023: Under Review & Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 02/25/2023: Awaiting Editor-in-Chief Decision 03/03/2023: Accept Eventually, they reached the stage of "awaiting reviewer scores. Then I revised and resubmitted. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 6. Sometimes, the editor, after going through the reviews, might feel that an additional review is required. Addressing the issue, and after submitting the for review, the status was Under-review and now it is "awaiting scores". But I remember that approximately one and a half months later is "awaiting reviewer scores. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. However you can make it clear that the paper is likely to be accepted in the future. After 1 week later the paper status has changed to "under review" and then after two weeks later the paper status has changed to "with editor". Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". reviewers is necessary after a moderate revision. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. T his is often a part of the journal evaluation processes, especially when the reviews that have already come in are conflicting or weak and the editor is unable to arrive at a decision based Pre-refereeing stage Upon receiving a new manuscript, the editorial office conducts initial pre-refereeing checks to ensure the article is legible, complete, correctly formatted, original, within the scope of the journal in question, in the style of a scientific article, and written in clear English. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. What does "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" mean within the context of a ScholarOne submission system? 2. “awaiting reviewer score”. the status of my revised manuscript is showing "awaiting reviewer scores" again. Often, the reviewers from the previous version will be auto-populated into the “Awaiting Reviewer Scores” tab of the revised version. Awaiting recommendations: waiting for an editor to make a recommendation Recommendation can be "get another review" so it goes back to the review cycle. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. Asked 4th Aug, 2021; However, the status of my revised manuscript is showing "awaiting reviewer scores" again. Now it is almost 3 weeks. dadan20210817 2023-03-03 Thank you for sharing, I appreciate Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable When you review a paper you read a manuscript critically, and start to realize potential criticisms reviewers might have of your future papers. I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. It has been almost two weeks without any reply. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. 09. " Does this I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again It was submitted after revision. 30 TE verifies reviewer comments Reviewer comments: Reviewers BCD agree to accept. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. " The article's status is currently R0: Revise and Resubmit; R1: Accept As Regular Paper After Minor I submitted my manuscript to Management Science. But only after two days under review the status changed to “ What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? Hot Network Questions Testing the coefficients of PI controller in time After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". Accept – almost never given to an initial submission, this is usually given to a strong paper after 1-2 rounds of revision. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE A direct change after submission (or after the initial admin check) to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ typically means that the Associate Editor (AE) has had a look at the paper and decided not to send it for review. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. And it changed to “awaiting reviewer scores” on the 17th, which was same as (the experience of) the one on the 69th floor. This change has occurred The status is "under review" because the editor decided to ask the reviewers to look at the paper again. Still the status is same. Does this The paper was accepted with minor corrections after 3 rounds of peer review by all the reviewers, however, in the last review concerns regarding the grammar and running sentences were raised by one of the reviewers. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. Then I wholly revised my paper according to reviewers’ comments and re-submitted it. Humanities Anyone have insight as to why this might have happened? If it matters, this draft has already been through a revise & resubmit. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? I submitted a paper to some journal. Skip to main content. academicjournalpublishing. " Does this Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision With AtoZ The World, information about world history, cultures, languages, foods, religions, and much more is just a click away, awaiting reviewer scores vs under review. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. In the 2nd revision, I could not understand the editorial manager paper status meaning. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. The minimum would be either two or three depending on the “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. 10. Related reading: After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. The paper received an R&R last summer and a revised version was provided. 15 answers. There are two bullet points that have remained unchanged for about 8 weeks now - one saying 'awaiting reviewer scores' and the other saying 'awaiting recommendation'. At this After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). . The status of the paper has since changed from "Under Review" to "Decision If accepted, the paper is sent to production. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. However, it's been around 40 days that the status has not changed and I haven't received a decision. Meaning of 'Revision' status for a revised paper these are the statuses, respectively, for when the paper is in peer review (‘Awaiting reviewer scores’) and after (‘Revision’). I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. I'm aware of the typical workflow of a journal. I don't know what happened, but it doesn't feel good. 2022 awaiting reviewer scores 22. First status was awaiting reviewer score then awaiting AE recommendation decision and today again showing status awaiting The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain: new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation; observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking; My manuscript status changed from ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores’ to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation,’ but the same day, it went back to ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores. It is indeed not rare to get desk rejection after several weeks. I thought I had reached AE, but within a day, I was sent back. Some reviewers will ask for a longer period of time; if the request is reasonable, please grant it. Oluwadara I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise In contrast, if in this journal the peer-review typically takes several months, then it might be long desk-rejection. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. 20 Major Revision 12. I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Also, keep in mind rejection rate without review in your journal. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. I wrote 26 pages for the first review, and 13 pages for the second review, while my paper is only 13 pages long. 08. BJU International is a company limited by guarantee, incorporated in England, and is a charity. Q. Do not send a minor revision to reviewers. Aug 8, 2014 Jul 15, 2019 · Thus the follow-on status “under review” means that the manuscript has been sent get with review. The paper status has changed from "major revision" to "with editor" after submitting the revised paper. If I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. How If a manuscript is awaiting revision, you will be able to extend the due date using the “Due on:” box and clicking “Save. Note that the time it takes for an editor to The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is having in getting the requisite number of Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. " Does it mean that my paper will go through You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your manuscript after major revisions. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. What does "Revise" mean? 2. Anyway, as yours was a minor revision, you probably don’t have much need to worry, which actually My manuscript went from "awaiting recommendation" back to "awaiting referee scores. The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. No matter which decision you receive, be sure to read the entire decision letter carefully. I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. I submitted the revision almost 2 months back. Has In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? I have a paper that was under review with one of Wiley's journals. How do I know if a manuscript is a resubmission? What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision Hi. This change has occurred Hi, I submitted my revised paper in a journal after making major revision. Awaiting reviewer scores means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the associate editor has set for the manuscript. So, if you mean these are the statuses after After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. What does 12. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. You would want to do this if some reviews are not due yet and you need the additional reviews to make a recommendation. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 2. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers the revision is sent out for a second round of reviews, asking at least one of the previous reviewers to comment on the Does anyone know what Awaiting AE Assignment after one month of Awaiting Reviewer Scores means in ScholarOne? I find this very weird. Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. What can this mean? The platform is scholarone. In case of a rejection decision, note I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. For Now, after reviewer scores and after awaiting recommendation, the status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and " Awaiting Final Decision" together. 5. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. Otherwise, please invite a different reviewer instead. 03 Awaiting reviewer scores. 4 answers Then, they recommend our paper be accepted for publication after a minor revision (04/06/2020) that we have answered in detail. Pay special attention to deadlines and next steps. the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. In the case What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. 2022 awaiting final decision 24. I don't understand what this means. What to do when two months after Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. This change has occurred After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. How long I should wait for the final verdict? Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. " I sent an email to the editor-in-chief as this was the only contact information given for queries. Now, this status has remained for 18 days. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. But the editor has sent your manuscript to another reviewer that's why it's again awaiting reviewer. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. " After a month, the scores were received, and a recommendation was made. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" 2023. expression, and review. "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. After [i resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was some reviewers agree to review, but don't submit their reports by the deadline (or tell the editor that they won't be able to complete the review after all. However, I definitely remember the last two: Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. Minor Revision – Rarely given I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted a manuscript to ScholarOne about 10 weeks ago. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. As 3 months have past after re What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. In most cases, if a paper is returned after a relatively minor revision, and Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. Is it a bad sign? Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. Is this common in scientific journals? I submitted others manuscripts to other journals and the review process was I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. AE turnarounds – a If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. " Related reading: Why Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. This change has occurred Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still "awaiting reviewer invitation. 06. This is the stage that the editorial team will be striving to get your manuscript to as swiftly as possible. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". I think awaiting reviewers' scores after revision means that your response to the queries raise is under Sep 7, 2021 · In your case, it is possible that the revised manuscript was taken up by an editor/associate However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. Or, the reviewers' reports come in and they are conflicting, so the editor wants more reviews to help him/her make a decision. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. 2022 Awaiting final decision 17. 7 answers A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). If a manuscript is awaiting revision, you will be able to extend the due date using the “Due on:” box and clicking “Save. Now the handling I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Awaiting Reviewer Scores. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. Clearly state the contributions made in the 17. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. hyai tfvbxgp xvjzvs necp tirnfbyj avvbr zgaaa gcqxs eqnkoxb onou